Difference between revisions of "DNA Sequencing"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[[Roche 454]] | *[[Roche 454]] | ||
*[[Pacific Biosciences RS]] | *[[Pacific Biosciences RS]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | =To Do= | ||
| + | Quail, M. A., Smith, M., Coupland, P., Otto, T. D., Harris, S. R., Connor, T. R., ... & Gu, Y. (2012). A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC genomics, 13(1), 341. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Loman, N. J., Misra, R. V., Dallman, T. J., Constantinidou, C., Gharbia, S. E., Wain, J., & Pallen, M. J. (2012). Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nature biotechnology, 30(5), 434-439. | ||
Revision as of 00:36, 19 July 2014
There are several new technologies for whole genome sequencing in addition to the classic workhorse of Sanger sequencing. This area is rapidly changing and it is challenging to stay on top of the current technology.
Here are some major technologies being used:
To Do
Quail, M. A., Smith, M., Coupland, P., Otto, T. D., Harris, S. R., Connor, T. R., ... & Gu, Y. (2012). A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC genomics, 13(1), 341.
Loman, N. J., Misra, R. V., Dallman, T. J., Constantinidou, C., Gharbia, S. E., Wain, J., & Pallen, M. J. (2012). Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nature biotechnology, 30(5), 434-439.
