Difference between revisions of "Reed 2007"
From Genetics Wiki
(→Links) |
(→Notes) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Links= | =Links= | ||
| + | *http://www.genetics.org/content/176/3/1923 | ||
*https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.069997 | *https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.069997 | ||
*http://hawaiireedlab.com/pdf/r/reed2007.pdf (internal lab link only) | *http://hawaiireedlab.com/pdf/r/reed2007.pdf (internal lab link only) | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Notes= | ||
| + | [[Parrondo’s Paradox]] is a fun, initially counter intuitive, dynamic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would like to revisit this and look at possible resonance with stochastic effects. | ||
[[Category:Publication]] | [[Category:Publication]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:16, 22 September 2018
Citation
Reed, F. A. (2007) Two-locus epistasis with sexually antagonistic selection: A genetic Parrondo’s paradox. Genetics 176: 1923-1929.
Links
- http://www.genetics.org/content/176/3/1923
- https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.069997
- http://hawaiireedlab.com/pdf/r/reed2007.pdf (internal lab link only)
Notes
Parrondo’s Paradox is a fun, initially counter intuitive, dynamic.
I would like to revisit this and look at possible resonance with stochastic effects.
