Difference between revisions of "Hays et al. 2015"
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
They refer to lichens and biofilms as examples of beneficial properties of increased robustness compared to axenic (consisting of only a single cell type) biofilms. | They refer to lichens and biofilms as examples of beneficial properties of increased robustness compared to axenic (consisting of only a single cell type) biofilms. | ||
− | ''[[Chlorochromatium aggregatum]]'' is used as an example of division of labor. One bacteria is photosynthetic and | + | ''[[Chlorochromatium aggregatum]]'' is used as an example of division of labor. One bacteria is photosynthetic epibiont and rides on a motile β-proteobacter towards light. In return the β-proteobacter, which has a reduced genome, gets energy from the epibiont. ... to be continued. |
[[Category:Publication]] | [[Category:Publication]] |
Revision as of 12:52, 3 September 2018
Hays, S. G., Patrick, W. G., Ziesack, M., Oxman, N., & Silver, P. A. (2015). Better together: engineering and application of microbial symbioses. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 36, 40-49.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=386145057668943362
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095816691500107X
Published Abstract
Symbioses provide a way to surpass the limitations of individual microbes. Natural communities exemplify this in symbioses like lichens and biofilms that are robust to perturbations, an essential feature in fluctuating environments. Metabolic capabilities also expand in consortia enabling the division of labor across organisms as seen in photosynthetic and methanogenic communities. In engineered consortia, the external environment provides levers of control for microbes repurposed from nature or engineered to interact through synthetic biology. Consortia have successfully been applied to real-world problems including remediation and energy, however there are still fundamental questions to be answered. It is clear that continued study is necessary for the understanding and engineering of microbial systems that are more than the sum of their parts.
Published Highlights
- Microbial communities are naturally abundant.
- Natural symbioses exhibit increased robustness and metabolic capabilities.
- Technological advances in environmental control are applied to microbial cocultures.
- Synthetic biology can be used to engineer microbial communities.
- Microbial consortia are well suited for application to real-world problems.
Notes
This review focuses on the effects of coculturing microbes together and how this can have advantages, both for the microbes and for biological engineering (Synthetic Biology) goals. The authors refer to this beneficial coculturing situation as consortia (referring to the term consortium in the business world of independent companies working together for a mutually beneficial outcome).
They refer to lichens and biofilms as examples of beneficial properties of increased robustness compared to axenic (consisting of only a single cell type) biofilms.
Chlorochromatium aggregatum is used as an example of division of labor. One bacteria is photosynthetic epibiont and rides on a motile β-proteobacter towards light. In return the β-proteobacter, which has a reduced genome, gets energy from the epibiont. ... to be continued.