User Tools

Site Tools


floyd_reed

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
floyd_reed [2019/09/23 05:53]
floyd
floyd_reed [2019/10/10 00:38] (current)
floyd [Publications]
Line 31: Line 31:
   * Reed, F. A. (2007). Two-locus epistasis with sexually antagonistic selection: A genetic Parrondo's paradox. //Genetics//, 176(3), 1923--1929.   * Reed, F. A. (2007). Two-locus epistasis with sexually antagonistic selection: A genetic Parrondo's paradox. //Genetics//, 176(3), 1923--1929.
   * Reed, F. A., & Tishkoff, S. A. (2006). Positive selection can create false hotspots of recombination. //Genetics//, 172(3), 2011--2014.   * Reed, F. A., & Tishkoff, S. A. (2006). Positive selection can create false hotspots of recombination. //Genetics//, 172(3), 2011--2014.
-  * Reed, F. A., Akey, J. M., & Aquadro, C. F. (2005). Fitting background-selection predictions to levels of nucleotide variation and divergence along the human autosomes. //Genome Research//, 15(9), 1211--1221.+  * [[Reed et al 2005b|Reed, F. A., Akey, J. M., & Aquadro, C. F. (2005). Fitting background-selection predictions to levels of nucleotide variation and divergence along the human autosomes. Genome Research, 15(9), 1211-1221.]]
   * Reed, F. A., Reeves, R. G., & Aquadro, C. F. (2005). Evidence of susceptibility and resistance to cryptic X‐linked meiotic drive in natural populations of //Drosophila melanogaster//. //Evolution//, 59(6), 1280--1291.   * Reed, F. A., Reeves, R. G., & Aquadro, C. F. (2005). Evidence of susceptibility and resistance to cryptic X‐linked meiotic drive in natural populations of //Drosophila melanogaster//. //Evolution//, 59(6), 1280--1291.
   * Aquadro, C. F., DuMont, V. B., & Reed, F. A. (2001). Genome-wide variation in the human and fruitfly: a comparison. //Current Opinion in Genetics & Development//, 11(6), 627--634.   * Aquadro, C. F., DuMont, V. B., & Reed, F. A. (2001). Genome-wide variation in the human and fruitfly: a comparison. //Current Opinion in Genetics & Development//, 11(6), 627--634.
floyd_reed.txt · Last modified: 2019/10/10 00:38 by floyd