User Tools

Site Tools


haldane_1937

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
haldane_1937 [2019/09/15 04:43]
floyd
haldane_1937 [2019/09/16 03:35] (current)
floyd
Line 103: Line 103:
 where $m$ is the mutation rate $\mu$ at the $i$<sup>th</sup> locus for recessive mutations and $m=2\mu$ for dominant effects.  where $m$ is the mutation rate $\mu$ at the $i$<sup>th</sup> locus for recessive mutations and $m=2\mu$ for dominant effects. 
  
-If the per nucleotide per generation mutation rate is $10^{-8}$ and a tenth of our 3.3 billion base pair genome is under purifying selection then+If the per nucleotide per generation mutation rate is $10^{-8}$a tenth of our 3.3 billion base pair genome is under purifying selection, and the majority of mutations are recessive in fitness effects then
  
-$$F \approx (1-10^{-8})^{3.3 \times 10^8}\approx 0.037 $$+$$F \approx (1-10^{-8})^{3.3 \times 10^8}\approx 0.037\mbox{.}$$
  
 Therefore, our fitness is predicted to be a small fraction, approximately 3--4%, of its theoretical maximum without mutations (both new mutations that have occurred in our own genomes and mutations that we have inherited from our ancestors).  Therefore, our fitness is predicted to be a small fraction, approximately 3--4%, of its theoretical maximum without mutations (both new mutations that have occurred in our own genomes and mutations that we have inherited from our ancestors). 
haldane_1937.1568522610.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2019/09/15 04:43 by floyd