User Tools

Site Tools


title

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
title [2019/10/05 03:54]
floyd
title [2019/10/05 04:39]
floyd
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 Here are some publications with various titles.  Here are some publications with various titles. 
-  * Needham, D. M., Yoshizawa, S., Hosaka, T., Poirier, C., Choi, C. J., Hehenberger, E., ... & Kurihara, R. (2019). A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201907517. +  * [[Needham et al 2019|Needham, D. M., Yoshizawa, S., Hosaka, T., Poirier, C., Choi, C. J., Hehenberger, E., ... & Kurihara, R. (2019). A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201907517.]] 
-  * Rundle, H. D., & Schluter, D. (1998). Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution, 52(1), 200-208. +  * [[Rundle and Schluter 1998|Rundle, H. D., & Schluter, D. (1998). Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution, 52(1), 200-208.]] 
-  * Coates, M., & Ruta, M. (2000). Nice snake, shame about the legs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(12), 503-507. +  * [[Coates and Ruta 2000|Coates, M., & Ruta, M. (2000). Nice snake, shame about the legs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(12), 503-507.]] 
-  * Graur, D., & Martin, W. (2004). Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision. TRENDS in Genetics, 20(2), 80-86. +  * [[Graur and Martin 2004|Graur, D., & Martin, W. (2004). Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision. TRENDS in Genetics, 20(2), 80-86.]] 
-  * Glazko, G. V., Koonin, E. V., & Rogozin, I. B. (2005). Molecular dating: ape bones agree with chicken entrails. Trends in Genetics, 21(2), 89-92. +  * [[Glazko et al 2005|Glazko, G. V., Koonin, E. V., & Rogozin, I. B. (2005). Molecular dating: ape bones agree with chicken entrails. Trends in Genetics, 21(2), 89-92.]] 
-  * Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606-623.+  * [[Merton 1988|Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606-623.]]
  
 The first one "A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators" was used as a counter argument when I once said titles were not that useful. It succinctly presents the important/interesting points of the paper.  The first one "A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators" was used as a counter argument when I once said titles were not that useful. It succinctly presents the important/interesting points of the paper. 
title.txt · Last modified: 2019/10/06 16:07 by floyd