Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
|
Last revision
Both sides next revision
|
title [2019/10/05 17:07] floyd |
title [2019/10/06 16:06] floyd |
* [[Merton 1988|Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606-623.]] | * [[Merton 1988|Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606-623.]] |
| |
The first one "A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators" was used as a counter argument when I once said titles were not that useful when scanning through journal articles. It succinctly presents the important/interesting points of the paper. | The first one "A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators" was used as a counter argument when it was said in a discussion that titles were not that useful when scanning through journal articles. It succinctly presents the important/interesting points of the paper. |
| |
The next two "Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt" and "Nice snake, shame about the legs" are quite memorable. And when talking about reinforcement in the process of speciation "sympatry breeds contempt" is an elegant way to summarize a central idea. | The next two "Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt" and "Nice snake, shame about the legs" are quite memorable. And when talking about reinforcement in the process of speciation "sympatry breeds contempt" is an elegant way to summarize a central idea. |