Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[[Molecular Genetics]] | *[[Molecular Genetics]] | ||
*[[Genetic Engineering]] | *[[Genetic Engineering]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
However, this kind of division is very arbitrary and heavily influenced by historical progression of the different sub-fields. There are additional large fields that could be listed, but are not as primary as the divisions above (and some suffer from hyperbole), such as: | However, this kind of division is very arbitrary and heavily influenced by historical progression of the different sub-fields. There are additional large fields that could be listed, but are not as primary as the divisions above (and some suffer from hyperbole), such as: | ||
*[[Ancient DNA]] | *[[Ancient DNA]] | ||
+ | *[[Cancer Genetics]] | ||
*[[Conservation Genetics]] | *[[Conservation Genetics]] | ||
*[[Developmental Genetics]] | *[[Developmental Genetics]] | ||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
*[[Epigenetics]] | *[[Epigenetics]] | ||
*[[Experimental Evolution]] | *[[Experimental Evolution]] | ||
− | *[[ | + | *[[Gene-Culture Coevolution]] |
*[[Genetic Anthropology]] | *[[Genetic Anthropology]] | ||
*[[Human and Medical Genetics]] | *[[Human and Medical Genetics]] | ||
Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
*[[Synthetic Biology]] | *[[Synthetic Biology]] | ||
*[[Systems Biology]] | *[[Systems Biology]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are also fields outside of the natural sciences that interface with genetics. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[Genetics and Ethics]] | ||
+ | *[[Genetics and Laws]] | ||
+ | *[[History of Genetics]] | ||
+ | *[[Teaching Genetics]] | ||
I am purposely avoiding dividing the field by taxonomy (except for human genetics and related fields). The classical taxonomic divisions of biology are losing their usefulness. A large part of this is due to genetics and evolution where the same basic principles can apply across a wide range of organisms. I am also avoiding separating genetics and genomics, some tools and approaches may be different but these are really ends of a continuum that has been artificially exaggerated. | I am purposely avoiding dividing the field by taxonomy (except for human genetics and related fields). The classical taxonomic divisions of biology are losing their usefulness. A large part of this is due to genetics and evolution where the same basic principles can apply across a wide range of organisms. I am also avoiding separating genetics and genomics, some tools and approaches may be different but these are really ends of a continuum that has been artificially exaggerated. |
Revision as of 03:12, 17 July 2014
Genetics and Evolution are central to modern biological understanding. Genetics itself is a huge, rapidly changing field and can be divided into several main categories.
However, this kind of division is very arbitrary and heavily influenced by historical progression of the different sub-fields. There are additional large fields that could be listed, but are not as primary as the divisions above (and some suffer from hyperbole), such as:
- Ancient DNA
- Cancer Genetics
- Conservation Genetics
- Developmental Genetics
- Ecological Genetics
- Epigenetics
- Experimental Evolution
- Gene-Culture Coevolution
- Genetic Anthropology
- Human and Medical Genetics
- Metagenomics
- Microbiome Genetics
- Personal Genomics
- Phylogenetics
- Synthetic Biology
- Systems Biology
There are also fields outside of the natural sciences that interface with genetics.
I am purposely avoiding dividing the field by taxonomy (except for human genetics and related fields). The classical taxonomic divisions of biology are losing their usefulness. A large part of this is due to genetics and evolution where the same basic principles can apply across a wide range of organisms. I am also avoiding separating genetics and genomics, some tools and approaches may be different but these are really ends of a continuum that has been artificially exaggerated.
One way to get started is by reading about what a gene is, genetic heritability versus environmental effects on phenotype variance, and the structure of DNA.